NVS 285 vs NVS 300 - Intro
I couldn't find a straight comparison of the NVS 285 vs NVS 300 on the web so have made this page.
NVS 285 vs NVS 300 - Bench Marks
www.videocardbenchmark.net gives rating of 34 and 196 to the NVS 285 and NVS 300 respectively.
 |
| NVS 285 - (From PassMark) |
 |
| NVS 300 |
NVS 285 vs NVS 300 - Compared
| Feature |
NVS 285 | NVS 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface Memory Size Memory Interface Memory Bandwidth MEmory Speed CUDA Processor Cores Display Connectors OpenGL Power and Cooling |
PCI-Express 128MB DDR 64-bit 4.4 GB/s 350MHz NA 2 21 Watts (Passive) | PCI Express x16 PCI Express x1 512MB DDR3 64-bit 12.6 GB/s 16 2 3.3 17.5 Watts (Passive) |
Picture |
 |
 |
| Video | Sunlight and Daylight Assessment |
Just fitted an RX460 card, myself.
ReplyDelete14mm fab.
2MB GDDR5 memory.
will set you back about 100 quid.
TDP is stated as less than 75W.
If you buy a "standard" model like mine, it will run from just the PCI-e 16x slot.
If you get an overclocked one, some of then have a separate power connector as well.
Only catches are ...
it's 100 quid (!)
it's double width (with a fan and cover taking up the second slot!)
Your preferred ranking site rates the RX460 as 4173, which places it as (currently) in the top thir od their "high end" listing.
For a card with a modest power draw, there isn't much better available!
Which is why I my screen is powered by an RX460 as I write this!